Deloitte Top 200: Chairperson of the Year: Mark Verbiest - Meridian, Summerset

Mark Verbiest’s respected and trusted governance style, along with the success of the companies he chairs, is what distinguished him as the Chairperson of the Year in this year’s Deloitte Top 200 awards.

Verbiest is chair of Meridian Energy and Summerset Group and a director of ANZ Bank New Zealand. He previously chaired Spark, Transpower, Freightways and Willis Bond Capital Partners, and was a director of the Financial Markets Authority.

“He operates with a respected and trusted governance style, a highly collaborative approach, and clearly relishes the diversity of thought that comes from working as part of a team,” says Deloitte Top 200 judge Hinerangi Raumati-Tu’ua. “The companies Mark is involved in are all quite different, and are all performing well.”

Verbiest says he is a good listener and has always had a very keen eye and ear to the wider stakeholder set.

“That is really important,” he says. “I am not one to shut people down in conversation or steer people in a particular direction.”

The judges recognise that it speaks to the way someone is regarded around the board table when they become the chair of multiple boards as Verbiest has done — especially since the workload of a chair is multiples of that of a director.

Meridian’s net profit after tax rose 55 per cent in the year to June, with the company reporting customer sales volumes growing six per cent. Summerset Group delivered an underlying profit of $82.5 million for the six months ended 30 June 2022, a 9.2 per cent increase on the first half of 2021.

Verbiest says it is important to him that the roles he takes on not only make a meaningful difference to New Zealand, but they must also involve a challenge. He points to Summerset Group, one of New Zealand’s leading retirement village operators, as an organisation that fulfils both these requirements.

Like many countries around the world, New Zealand has an ageing population, and it is projected that by 2034 there will be 1.2 million people aged 65 and over. With this, it is expected that demand for aged care services will also increase.

“I am very conscious that we need facilities that provide care not only for our residents, but also for people that come in from outside,” says Verbiest. “That has become a challenging space given the dearth of people, including aged care nurses, that are currently available. It is a problem that is becoming progressively worse, with the burden falling more and more on the public sector which is already stretched.”

For Meridian Energy, Verbiest says the bold climate change and clean energy aspirations the board and management team have agreed is another big challenge but will also make an important difference to New Zealand.

As part of Meridian’s refreshed Climate Action Plan, the country’s largest renewable energy generator plans to take ambitious action on climate change to achieve its ‘Half by 30′ target, halving its FY21 baseline emissions by FY30 — including all scope 1, 2 and 3 categories. Meridian is also supporting New Zealand’s efforts to achieve net zero emissions for all greenhouse gases by 2050, which Verbiest says the entire organisation from top to bottom is committed to.

“Given we produce 30 per cent of New Zealand’s needs, there is a massive amount of capital investment we need to commit to over a long period of time — these are not short-dated assets.”

Meridian recently announced a target of bringing seven new large-scale renewable generation projects into operation around New Zealand in the next seven years. “We focus on this a lot, even though some investors might say we can’t be certain on returns because the policy isn’t clear at the moment,” Verbiest says.

“But we are going to go for it anyway because it needs to happen, and we are making some assumptions that the things we can’t control will work out.”

Finalist: Prue Flacks

Prue Flacks has chaired Mercury since 2019, having been a director since 2010. She was previously a director of Chorus, BNZ and chair of Queenstown Airport.

The Deloitte Top 200 judges applaud the role Flacks has played successfully navigating the electricity generator and retailer of electricity, gas, broadband and mobile services through significant change recently.

“Flacks has overseen some of the most challenging aspects the role of chair carries with it over the past few years, while the organisation continues to deliver for shareholders,” says Deloitte Top 200 judge Raumati-Tu’ua.

In 2020, Mercury’s chief executive Fraser Whineray left after five years as chief executive and 11 years service with the business. The judges note the transition to Vince Hawksworth, previously chief executive of Trustpower, is an example of a great CEO transition which has gone well.

“We were lucky to get Vince on board, one of the most experienced chief executives in the industry,” says Flacks. “He has a very clear understanding of the expectations and priorities of the board and I support him to do what the company needs to deliver. We operate a very high trust model, which has been very effective.”

She describes the role of chair as providing an important bridge between the board and management and says the composition of the board is something that must be carefully managed.

“Having the right people with the right skills around the table, and balancing that with experience and personalities is easier said than done,” she says. “I try to create an environment where everyone feels they can contribute.”

The judges congratulated Flacks for overseeing meaningful acquisitions. The New Zealand operations of Tilt Renewables was acquired in late 2021, followed by Trustpower this year. The latter has doubled Mercury’s total customer connections and accelerated its entry into the telecommunications market.

“We are now New Zealand’s biggest electricity retailer by customer market share — that is the opportunity Trustpower gave us,” Flacks says.

“It is not that being biggest is best, but scale does matter. Trustpower and Mercury were two complementary businesses but putting them together has given us scale and a good platform to invest further.”

Flacks says that the challenge for gentailers is fulfilling the critical role they play in the transition to a low carbon economy, while also being mindful of the current economic climate.

“We need to ensure Mercury is able to contribute to the significant investment that will be critical if the country is to achieve its 2050 carbon objectives, but at the same time we acknowledge that electricity is an essential utility and the electricity bill is a large component of some household budgets.”

She says Mercury has been providing support to customers facing financial difficulties, working alongside Kāinga Ora, budgeting agencies and community organisations.

“We are trying different ways to make sure our customers aren’t left behind as we also invest in the new generation that is required,” she says.

“It is a difficult challenge. We tend to attract a lot of criticism that I don’t think is always deserved.”

Finalist: Dame Therese Walsh

The Deloitte Top 200 judges say that as chair of both Air New Zealand and ASB Bank, Dame Therese Walsh has demonstrated her mettle as a chairperson throughout the pandemic.

Walsh also chairs the Chapter Zero NZ steering group, part of a global network of directors committed to taking action on climate change. She is a director of Antarctica New Zealand and On Being Bold — a collaboration of business leaders inspiring women at all stages of their careers.

Walsh was previously chair of TVNZ and Pro-Chancellor of Victoria University of Wellington and was made a Dame Companion of the New Zealand Order of Merit in the 2015 Queen’s Birthday Honours for her contribution to sports administration.

Deloitte Top 200 judge Raumati-Tu’ua says Walsh has an engaging and inclusive style, and has defined herself as someone who excels in the role.

Walsh likes to oversee a “slightly more extrovert board”, by making sure directors get out of the boardroom.

“I don’t want to be hidden in the boardroom the entire time,” she says. “It is really important to understand what your customers, staff and other stakeholders are truly feeling about the business.”

This is, in part, why Walsh convened the recent Air New Zealand business mission to New York.

She says that trip, led on the ground by Deputy Prime Minister Grant Robertson, was a chance to remind some of New Zealand’s top business leaders what they had been missing out on as Air New Zealand gets back to doing what it used to do: “being a really important part of NZ Inc thinking and the country’s economic development”.

Air New Zealand was hit hard by the pandemic and had to react swiftly to the curve balls of Covid which saw international borders closed and severely restricted domestic travel.

Walsh oversaw the airline through the turmoil, including a successful $1.2 billion equity raise, which will be used to repay its government loan and strengthen its financial position for recovery.

“This was fundamental to the ongoing ability for Air New Zealand to operate and support the NZ economy — it was mission critical,” she says.

Raumati-Tu’ua says that alongside Air New Zealand, Walsh has also competently led ASB Bank through a period of deep global and domestic financial and economic uncertainty.

Walsh says uncertainty, and “picking what needs to be done and the right time to do them” has been something that unites her role as chair of ASB Bank and Air New Zealand.

“The broad and deep global and domestic financial and economic uncertainty means that ASB is continuing to identify ways to assist and support its customers to prosper and make financial progress,” she says.

Despite her corporate successes over the past 12 months, Walsh says what has been most rewarding has been the ability to reconnect in person with the teams across the organisations she is involved in.

“It has been the ability to have them back in the office, interact with them and hear what has been happening in their lives and how passionate they remain. People have endured a lot. It is those smaller moments from reconnecting that have been the real highlight.”

The Chairperson of the Year award is sponsored by Forsyth Barr.

Deloitte Top 200: Resilience in a challenging year

Deloitte Top 200: Resilience in a challenging year

The high-level view of the 2022 Deloitte Top 200 Index shows total revenues for Top 200 companies increased 9.8 per cent from $187,418m in 2021 to $205,764m in 2022. This compares to a 0.5 per cent increase between 2020 and 2021.

Underlying earnings (ebitda) increased from $25,139m in 2021 to $29,370m in 2022. This is an increase of 16.8 per cent, compared to a 6.3 per cent increase in 2021.

The ebitda margin, an assessment of operating profitability as a percentage of total revenue (total ebitda/total revenue) increased slightly between 2021 (13.4 per cent) and 2022 (14.3 per cent).

Total profits after tax have increased from $6802m in 2021 to $10,518m in 2022. This is a 54.6 per cent increase year on year, compared to a 21.6 per cent increase in 2021. Net profit margin (profit after tax/total revenue) increased between 2021 (3.6 per cent) and 2022 (5.1 per cent).

Total Assets have increased from $257,470m in 2021 to $280,602m in 2022 – a 9.0 per cent increase, compared to a 4.5 per cent increase in 2021.

The number one spot in the Top 200 Index has been held by Fonterra since its formation in the early 1990s. This continues, with Fonterra’s revenue increasing 11.6 per cent during the year to reach $22,953m. This increase is mainly due to higher product sale prices.

The 200th-ranked entity on the Top 200 index in 2022 is a newcomer to the Index — Strait NZ — with revenue of $208m. Last year’s 200th ranked company, Aurecon, had revenue of $189m, a 10.1 per cent increase in revenue between 200th ranked companies year-on-year.

Transtasman healthcare and animal care products supplier Ebos Group maintained its number two ranking in the Top 200 Index, increasing its revenue by 15.7 per cent from $9,886m in 2021 to $11,439m in 2022. EBOS continued to expand and diversify, with several acquisitions completed during the year, which have contributed to revenue growth.

The revenue gap between the top two companies has remained fairly constant, slightly increasing by 7.8 per cent, as Fonterra had a revenue increase of 11.6 per cent.

Fletcher Building (ranked third) revenue increased by 4.7 per cent from $8120m in 2021 to $8498m in 2022.

The top 10 in the Index has seen some movement in 2022, with Mainfreight moving up to the sixth place (10th place in 2021) and Z Energy re-entering in seventh (fifth place in 2020 and 11th in 2021).

Zespri has moved down to eighth place from seventh in 2021, Foodstuffs NI has moved down to the ninth place from eighth place in 2021, and Meridian Energy has moved down to 10th place from sixth place in 2021.

These movements in the top 10 see Spark moving down from ninth place in 2021 to 11th in 2022.

Top Profits

The top profit for 2022 was $693m, reported by retirement village operator Ryman Healthcare (91st in the Top 200 Index). Ryman was ranked fifth for profit in 2021 with a profit after tax of $423m. Fair-value movement of investment properties of $746m contributed to its strong profit in 2022.

Last year’s top profit was held by Fonterra (ranked first in the 2022 Top 200 Index on a revenue basis), reporting a net profit of $532m in 2021. Fonterra also increased its profit after tax in 2022 to $661m, which sees it in second place in the profits ranking. The overall total of top 20 profits for 2022 has increased by 30.3 per cent year-on-year.

Further to this, the average profit after tax across all 200 companies has increased from $39.5m in FY21 to $52.6m in FY22 – a 33.2 per cent increase.

Mercury (21st) has moved up to third place in 2022, from 24th in 2021. Its profit after tax increased by 232.6 per cent from $141m in 2021 to $469m in 2022.

Meridian Energy (10th) has maintained its position of fourth place in 2022, with profit after tax increasing by 5.4 per cent from $428m in 2021 to $451m in 2022.

Fletcher Building (3rd) has moved up to fifth place in 2022, from eighth in 2021. Its profit after tax has increased by 38.5 per cent from $317m in 2021 to $439m in 2022.

F&P Healthcare (24th) and Auckland Airport (135th) have moved out of the top five profits for 2022, but remain in seventh and 18th place, respectively.

Biggest Losses

The biggest loss for 2022 was reported by Air New Zealand (ranked 17th in the Top 200 Index), with a loss of $591m.

Air New Zealand’s loss is larger than its 2021 loss after tax of $292m, moving the airline from reporting the third biggest loss in 2021 to the biggest loss in 2022.

Air New Zealand also incurred the biggest loss in 2020, reflective of the challenges faced by the air travel industry caused by border restrictions limiting international travel in response to the Covid-19 pandemic.

Channel Infrastructure (174th) and KiwiRail (54th) respectively hold the second and third biggest losses in 2022. Channel Infrastructure was previously known as Refining NZ and operated the Marsden Point refinery. Its loss is due to the change in operations from a refinery to an import terminal business.

KiwiRail was profitable in 2021 but had the second biggest loss in 2020.

CPB Contractors (98th) and Westland Dairy (63rd) respectively hold the fourth and fifth biggest losses in 2022. This is reasonably consistent with the loss positions they occupied last year — CPB Contractors was ranked 8th and Westland Dairy was 12th for 2021.

In 2021, hydrocarbon producer OMV (78th) reported the biggest loss ($567m). This has been turned around in 2022 with a profit of $123m.

Pacific Aluminium (43rd) has also moved out of the top biggest losses, from being placed second in 2021 (reporting a loss of $366m), to having a profit in 2022 of $140m.

Most improved profit

Oji Fibre Solutions (ranked 34th in the Top 200 Index) recorded the most improved profit out of all the entities on the Top 200 index, with a 4375.5 per cent increase from a $0.8m loss in 2021 to $34.1m profit in 2022.

Energy distributor Powerco, in 99th place, has the second most improved profit, recording a profit of $44.5m in 2022 compared to a $4.8m profit in 2021. This is an increase of 833.3 per cent.

Ballance Agri-Nutrients (35th) holds third place for most improved profit, with an increase of 617.2 per cent. In the current year, Ballance Agri-Nutrients recorded a profit of $55.8m, compared to a 2021 profit of $7.8m. The only overlap in the most improved profit list in 2022 relative to 2021 is agricultural cooperative Ravensdown (50th) in 12th place. Ravensdown was top of the most improved profit rankings in 2021 and has continued to grow in 2022, reporting a profit of $57.3m — an increase of 273.0 per cent.

Most Improved Revenue

Commodity merchandising and supply chain management company Wilmar Gavilon (ranked 90th in the Top 200 Index) reported the most improved revenue for 2022. Its revenue increased to $513m in the current year compared to $267m in 2021. Wilmar Gavilon was also second on the 2021 list of most improved revenue.

Second, for most improved revenue is Mitsubishi Motors NZ (58th). Mitsubishi Motors NZ had reported revenue of $429m in 2021, increasing to $795m in 2022 — an 85.6 per cent increase in revenue.

John Deere NZ (168th) has also seen a strong increase in revenue. It reported an increase of 63.3 per cent from $151m in 2021 to $245m in 2022, placing third for most improved revenue. This increase has meant John Deere NZ enter the Top 200 index for the first time.

China Forestry (40th) is the only other company to be included on this index for two years in a row.

Summit Forests (154th), Tetra Pak (164th), Sumitomo Chemical (165th), BMW NZ (182nd) and Blue Sky Meats (199th) are also new entrants to the Deloitte Top 200 Index in 2022 that have featured on the most improved revenue index in 2022.

Z Energy, Ballance Agri-Nutrients, Ravensdown and Blue Sky Meats are companies included in both the most improved profit and most improved revenue index in 2022.

Top Return on Assets

Return on assets (ROA) provides an indication of how efficiently a company manages its assets in order to generate earnings. It is calculated by measuring profit against the total assets reported. TAB (ranked 112th in the Top 200 Index) holds the top spot for return on assets having previously been in second place in 2020 and 2021. TAB has maintained a strong ROA of 81.4 per cent in 2022 compared to 94.5 per cent in 2021.

Two newcomers occupy the second and third place for return on assets. Sumitomo Chemical (165th) is in second place with a ROA of 34.2 per cent and Blue Sky Meats (199th) is in third place with a ROA of 31.8 per cent.

Top Return on Equity

Return on equity measures how effectively a company can generate income relative to the number of money shareholders have invested in the firm.

It is a useful tool for investors, particularly when comparing firms within the same industry and is calculated by measuring the revenue earned against the average equity held over the past two years — to prevent changes in shareholder contributions from skewing the results. Essential services provider Ventia (ranked 105th in the Top 200 Index) has taken the top spot for return on equity. It has moved from 197th place in 2021, with a return on equity percentage of 2454.6 per cent. Harvey Norman (33rd) has moved up from sixth place to second place for its return on equity of 564.8 per cent.

Bunnings (26th) maintained its third place with a return on equity of 355.9 per cent for 2022. TAB (112th) has dropped from second place to fifth place for its return on equity of 243.6 per cent.

The Newcomers

This year, 16 companies were added to the Deloitte Top 200 Index. This compares to last year when 22 companies were added to the Index.

Investment holding firm Oregon Group entered the Index at the highest rank (85th in the Top 200 Index) with revenue of $532m.

Also entering the Top 200 Index within the top 150 is energy distribution company Horizon Energy at 144th.

Just Missed the Cut

United Steel (ranked 201st) just missed the cut in the Top 200 Index by $2m, with the 200th ranked company (Strait NZ) achieving revenue of $208m. Mediaworks (202nd), Arvida Group (203rd), CablePrice (204th), Precinct Properties (205th) and Sealed Air (206th) were close to breaching the Index in the current year, all achieving revenue around the $200m mark.

Precinct Properties and Sealed Air have fallen out of the Top 200 in 2022, previously holding 189th and 194th places in 2021, respectively.

Top 30 Financial Institutions Index

The Top 30 Financial Institutions Index sees one new addition to the index, Fidelity Life (ranked 27th).

The Top 30 have once again grown their total asset bases, this year by $36,244m from $635,617m in 2021 to $671,861m in 2022. This is a 5.7 per cent increase which is consistent with the increase seen from 2020 to 2021.

The top bank is once again ANZ, holding assets of $184,769m which have increased by 2.8 per cent from its 2021 total asset value of $179,744m. ANZ sits comfortably at the top spot with a $63,247m gap in total asset values between first place and second place (ASB).

Furthermore, ANZ also outpaces all other banks in terms of profit and equity.

The second spot in the Index is now held by ASB, moving up from the third place in 2021, with total assets of $121,522m — an increase of 7.9 per cent from the previous year.

Westpac has dropped to third place in 2022 from second place in 2021, with total assets of $119,848m.

BNZ has stayed in fourth place in 2022, with total assets of $119,122m.

All of the big four banks — ANZ, ASB, Westpac and BNZ — have seen an increase in their total assets in the current year.

Of the big four banks, ASB has both the highest return on assets ratio at 1.3, and the highest return on equity ratio of 15.4.

Kiwibank has retained its fifth-place spot, with total assets of $31,547m. Kiwibank’s total assets have increased by 11.8 per cent from $28,229m in 2021.

Cumulative profits for the Top 30 financial institutions have increased by 34.0 per cent from $5200m in 2021 to $6969m in 2022.

All of the top four financial institutions have had an increase in profit year-on-year.

ANZ reported an increase in profit from $1373m to $1939m (41.2 per cent), ASB reported an increase in profit from $1321m to $1471m (11.4 per cent), BNZ reported an increase in profit from $762m to $1322m (73.5 per cent), and Westpac has increased profit from $681m to $1057m (55.2 per cent).

Cumulative equity has increased by 10.0 per cent from $56,248m in 2021 to $61,870m in 2022.

The top eight financial institutions have remained the same eight entities from 2021 to 2022.

Heartland Bank has moved up to the ninth place from 11th place in 2021, pushing AMP Life (10th place) and MUFG Bank (11th place) down one spot each.

  • It is noted that certain financial institutions may have released unaudited earnings announcements that are not reflected in the indices or commentary above.

Deloitte Top 200: Sustainable Business Leadership: KMD Brands

Deloitte Top 200: Sustainable Business Leadership: KMD Brands

For the second year in a row, KMD Brands has been acknowledged for its relentless focus on sustainability, taking out the Deloitte Top 200 Sustainable Business Leadership award.

The global outdoor, lifestyle and sports company, formally known as Kathmandu Holdings, is the parent company to three iconic brands — Kathmandu, Oboz and Rip Curl.

Kathmandu gained B-Corp certification in 2019, becoming the largest Australasian retailer to be certified through the stringent process which recognises the highest standards of environmental and social performance. The company continues to push for sustainable practices with both surfwear brand Rip Curl and hiking footwear brand Oboz also working toward gaining B-Corp certification in FY23.

KMD Brands’ consistency and leadership in putting sustainability at the heart of its strategy, along with its strong targets and transparent approach was why the Deloitte Top 200 judges awarded it in this category again — a company they say others should compare themselves to as part of their own sustainability journey.

“Kathmandu has significantly influenced Oboz and Ripcurl and the three brands combined are making real evolutionary strides,” says Top 200 judge Hinerangi Raumati-Tu’ua. “KMD Brands’ focus on sustainability is broader than just themselves — they also work closely with their suppliers. It is clear that KMD Brands is focused on being a global leader in environmental, social and governance (ESG).”

Chief Legal and ESG officer at KMD Brands, Frances Blundell, says that love of and connection to the outdoors is a foundation for all the company’s brands. “We are very aware of our responsibility to protect and preserve the natural environment and the communities around it — otherwise there won’t be anywhere left for our customers and our products to get out there and enjoy.”

The judges were impressed with KMD Brands’ action towards its science-based targets to reduce emissions in line with the Paris Climate Agreement goals. It aims to reduce absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions by a minimum of 47 per cent by 2030 from an FY19 base year, and absolute Scope 3 emissions by a minimum of 28 per cent.

Last year, KMD Brands secured what was then New Zealand’s largest sustainability-linked loan. The A$100 million loan is tied to ESG targets. In the first year, the emissions reduction target was achieved for Kathmandu, triggering a discounted interest rate.

KMD Brands’ transition to a circular business model will see it eliminate what it calls a “take-make-waste” approach to business. The concept now forms a core base for its work, including boosting the responsible material content in its products from materials that are regenerative, recycled or recyclable, bio-based, biodegradable, responsibly farmed or grown.

Blundell says the starting point for circularity is durability and making products that last many years and can be used for a long time.

“We want to avoid resources becoming waste and ending up in landfill,” she says. “This is a huge industry-wide issue. Each of our brands are setting their own specific goals, including using materials that can be regenerated, that come from recycled sources or can be recycled.”

As part of this commitment to circular thinking, KMD Brands is working on repurposing and recycling its own waste products. Taking neoprene offcuts from Rip Curl’s factory and recycling them into carpet underlay has diverted 133 tonnes of neoprene from landfill in the past year.

Rip Curl also introduced a world-first wetsuit take-back programme across Australia. It accepts wetsuits from any brand and repurposes them into soft-fall matting for playgrounds and outdoor gyms. The programme is now being expanded into the US, France, Spain and Portugal.

To ensure recognition of the interdependence between people and the planet is embedded into the mindset and expectations of employees, KMD Brands has amended its group code of ethics. ESG responsibilities have been added to job descriptions for all KMD Brands employees, and ESG-related objectives are now part of its employee goal-setting and performance review process. “The team is engaged with our sustainability values and motivated by the conversations happening in the business to embed ESG within decision-making,” Blundell says.

“Most people now know that they have a responsibility, and they want to contribute. Being part of something bigger than yourself is a really empowering feeling.”

Finalist: Meridian Energy

New Zealand’s largest renewable generator, Meridian Energy, generates its electricity from 100 per cent renewable sources — wind, hydro and solar.

Top 200 judge Hinerangi Raumati-Tu’ua notes Meridian has done a significant reset on its sustainability strategy that has driven ambitious targets and meaningful actions that are shifting the dial.

“It is good to see them embracing their role in New Zealand’s low carbon transition over and above ‘business as usual’ and committing capital in a way that is focused on delivering at pace given the urgency of climate change,” she says.

As part of its refreshed Climate Action Plan, Meridian plans to take ambitious action to achieve its “Half by 30″ target, reducing its gross operational emissions by FY30 from an FY21 baseline — including all scope 1, 2 and 3 categories.

Meridian has recently widened its focus from clean energy to bring a lens on “a fairer and healthier world”, which is driving a more holistic approach to its sustainability efforts.

This includes the adoption of the updated GRI (Global Reporting Initiative) standards that move away from evaluating materiality based on issues that immediately influence stakeholder decision-making to actual and potential positive and negative impacts on the environment, economy and people — including human rights.

Head of corporate affairs and sustainability Claire Shaw says this is part of the company’s efforts to future-proof its approach to sustainability.

“We have to act with integrity — which means doing all the big things really well, but also thinking about the impacts on others,” she says.

“You make different decisions when you put people at the heart of the transition. This is pushing us to think more broadly about ESG beyond delivering on decarbonisation.”

Since 2019, Meridian has achieved net zero carbon across the operations of its business. Where it can’t currently reduce its operational emissions, Meridian has purchased and surrendered gold standard, and verified emission reductions.

Meridian’s Forever Forests programme will see it displace this by creating its own carbon sink, investing in permanent forests in New Zealand and transitioning them to be 100 per cent native over time.

The judges were particularly impressed with how Meridian is leaning into its role to support New Zealand’s net zero by 2050 targets and its transition to a more sustainable, low-emissions economy.

Meridian continues to develop its renewable energy development pipeline to grow generation capacity, which will help the Government meet its target of 50 per cent of total final energy consumption to come from renewable sources by 2035.

Meridian continues to work with customers to accelerate the electrification of industrial heat away from coal and of transportation, and is exploring the economic, environmental and energy security opportunities of green hydrogen production.

Shaw says that Meridian’s size and scale means it thinks carefully about the impact of the systems that it operates in as it grows renewable energy for the country.

“We continue to respect our role as kaitiaki of the assets we are responsible for and we challenge ourselves to create long-term positive impact for New Zealand as a whole. If we do it well, we’ll unlock a future that’s good for tangata whenua, good for our customers, good for communities and our shareholders.”

Finalist: Fisher & Paykel Healthcare

Fisher & Paykel Healthcare (FPH) considers corporate social responsibility and sustainability to be inextricably linked to the way it does business.

The health equipment manufacturer, designer and marketer has a strong focus on the environment, responsible sourcing and efficient use of materials, waste reduction, and modern slavery, and has articulated its intentions in these areas in a new environmental and social responsibility policy.

“We have always had waste reduction optimisation in our DNA,” says Jonti Rhodes, vice president — supply chain, facilities & sustainability.

“But more recently we made a strong commitment to leaving a positive lasting impact on society and the environment. Not only through the products we provide, but also the environment, the community, and our carbon footprint.”

FPH recently formed a governance group with representatives from across the business to provide long-term strategic direction on how the business will continue to make progress in the most material areas.

The Top 200 judges note that there is real evidence of the company’s sustainability commitments and a clear intention to embed them into the nature of the business.

They were particularly impressed with the sustainability and social responsibility coverage in FPH’s annual report, and the balanced reporting that discusses the trade-offs between doing what is right for the patient and the many challenges to the environment this brings.

“Fisher & Paykel Healthcare has undergone a significant ramp up in sustainability initiatives in the last few years with key efforts on engaging with people across the business and making real change,” says Top 200 judge Raumati-Tu’ua.

“There is a real focus on key initiatives that can affect the wider industry and not just its own operations, including eco-design, sustainable packaging, bio-based and circular materials, and environmental lifecycle assessment.”

During the Covid-19 pandemic, demand for some of FPH’s key products increased by four to five times. This necessitated the need to work 24/7, resulting in higher electricity use and other direct emissions during the 2021 financial year.

But in the long term as Covid-19 diminishes, FPH is committed to decoupling carbon emissions from production levels. It has been piloting an internal carbon price during FY22 to factor carbon impact into its business decisions.

FPH has been measuring its carbon footprint since 2012, and since 2019 has set ambitious science-based targets for Scope 1 and 2 carbon emissions, along with a Scope 3 supplier engagement target.

It will launch a new sustainable procurement framework to suppliers in FY23 and FY24, selecting and collaborating with those that align with its values, while also providing education and support on relevant standards.

“As a large company, we have some resources that others don’t,” says Rhodes. “You can’t just expel those companies that aren’t meeting your standard — we are engaging the supply network and bringing them up to speed with what is needed.”

The judges also commend FPH’s efforts to nurture a positive and inclusive culture based on trust and respect. As part of this, it has established employee groups formed around shared identities and experiences and the judges recognise the improvement in the company’s diversity and inclusion statistics over the last year.

The Sustainable Business Leadership award is sponsored by The Aotearoa Circle.

Infrastructure: Women are a powerhouse in New Zealand infrastructure (NZ Herald)

Infrastructure: Women are a powerhouse in New Zealand infrastructure (NZ Herald)

Tim McCready looks at three key trends influencing the infrastructure sector

Over the past couple of years, the pandemic has had a serious impact on the cost and timings of infrastructure.

While 2022 was hoped to be the year the world returned to some kind of normality, events over the past year — including the evolution of the pandemic and the war in Ukraine — have brought with them supply chain constraints, inflation, and ongoing uncertainty. But despite these headwinds, there remains a steadfast focus on growing the sustainability and equity of the sector.

Here is a look at some of the big topics that will continue to shape the sector over the coming years:

Inflation and rising risks amid uncertain times

Inflation has become the dominating story facing the infrastructure industry in 2022.

The rapid escalation of the cost of construction is being felt worldwide and is creating major challenges for project delivery.

This is being exacerbated by ongoing supply chain constraints. Initially caused by the pandemic, this has continued as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the continued snap lockdowns in China.

In its latest quarterly report, the New Zealand Infrastructure Commission Te Waihanga, cautions that if inflation continues to run hot and supply chains remain constrained, it will be challenging to deliver infrastructure rapidly without stretching our limited capacity to build.

But though inflation statistics suggest demand is still outrunning supply, there are emerging signs of a global economic slowdown.

China’s continued push for zero-Covid and the intermittent lockdowns that come with it, combined with its struggling real estate market, has resulted in a sharp drop in growth and the world’s reliance on China will ensure that slowdown is felt everywhere.

Last month the International Monetary Fund (IMF) cut its global growth forecast for 2023 to 2.7 per cent from a previous forecast of 2.9 per cent. In a recent update, the IMF said recent high-frequency indicators “confirm that the outlook is gloomier” than projected, particularly in Europe.

Reduced economic activity will see inflation lessen, but will likely bring with it an increase in unemployment and insolvency risk for construction firms.

As rising interest rates reduce the ability to borrow and see demand for residential building fall away, it will place the broader construction sector under pressure and shift the focus from managing cost increases and capacity pressures to managing workload and maintaining financial sustainability.

As Te Waihanga notes, if the global economy tips over into recession, falling demand from non-infrastructure construction may ease the capacity and skills pressures seen over the last year, and bring with it an opportunity to deliver more infrastructure.

Advancing women in infrastructure

Like all industries, increasing diversity and inclusiveness will be a necessity to address challenges the infrastructure sector is facing.

There has been good progress on this front over the past year. A growing number of businesses in the sector have established diversity targets.

This year Fletcher Building reported its intern cohort had a 50:50 split between men and women, and its graduate cohort was 40 per cent women.

Tonkin and Taylor has found purposefully and openly talking about unconscious bias at all levels of the organisation has been a great tool to create an environment that has zero tolerance for discrimination.
Chief executive Penny Kneebone, says momentum regarding diversity and inclusivity has picked up across the sector in the past year, noticeably via the diversity of voices in the sector sharing their thoughts, perspectives and experience.

“That is great, but it is important to keep up the good mahi and build on that momentum,” Kneebone says. She’d like to see stronger progress made regarding diversity and inclusion metrics across the sector.

“We can talk the talk, but diversity and inclusion metrics will help give the industry insights and indicators on where to take action to improve and ensure that we’re walking the walk.”

Infrastructure New Zealand, the industry’s member association, has several initiatives to help its members create and sustain a diverse and inclusive infrastructure sector.

The group is chaired by Margaret Devlin, elected to the position at the 2021 AGM, who has a particular focus on people, diversity and culture.

She is also chair of Auckland’s Watercare and Lyttelton Port and a director of DairyNZ, Hamilton Airport, IT Partners Group and Waimea Water.

Earlier this year, Infrastructure NZ established a diversity advisory board to help address key challenges facing the sector.

The Women’s Infrastructure Network, set up in 2016 to increase the number of women in leadership roles and grow the visibility of women, now has seven chapters throughout the country and a combined membership of more than 2100 women.

To further attract women to the sector, managing director of international engineering consultancy Aurecon, Tracey Ryan, says there is no single approach that will work.

“It must be a combination of leadership, policies/systems and behaviours, she says.

“We also need to get in front of school children to help break down barriers and normalise that anyone can have a career in the infrastructure industry.

“There are now more senior female leaders in the industry which has been great progress — we are still a small group, but we’re not just a couple anymore.

“It’s about ‘you can’t be what you can’t see’, so the more we support women into senior and leadership roles the better.”

Ryan is herself also co-chair of the Construction Sector Accord.

Sustainable infrastructure to the fore

The built environment is estimated to be responsible for almost 50 per cent of all extracted materials and contributes some 40 per cent of global energy-related emissions.

Emissions are made up of a combination of the energy used to run a building day-to-day as well as embodied carbon emissions — those tied into the construction, maintenance and ultimate demolition.

The focus of green building has largely been on making buildings more efficient to run, which can often come at the expense of embodied carbon emissions. But with the global transition to sustainable and net-zero infrastructure emissions solutions continuing at pace, attention is now turning to the environmental impact of construction.

The heightened awareness of the sector’s impact on the environment means it is becoming increasingly unacceptable for companies to fail to make progress in this regard.

Bolstering this push is the energy crisis in Europe. The invasion of Ukraine has spurred an effort from European countries to reduce the use of oil and gas in the region and improve the energy efficiency of infrastructure.

Last month, the International Energy Agency (IEA) released its annual World Energy Outlook report and noted that the invasion is likely to accelerate the world’s transition to greener energy from fossil fuels.

“Energy markets and policies have changed as a result of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, not just for the time being, but for decades to come,” said IEA executive director Fatih Birol.

“Governments around the world are responding to the crisis by doubling down on clean energy — in the US, EU, Japan, China, India and elsewhere. Their new policies are set to help global clean energy investment rise above US$2 trillion a year by 2030, an increase of over 50 per cent from today.”

Infrastructure is not only highly responsible for climate change and integral to its mitigation, but it is also highly exposed to its effects.

If the coalition of nations is to meet the Paris Agreement to decarbonise the global economy by 2050, current momentum seen in green infrastructure looks set to continue.

In a world where the geopolitical and economic environment look shaky, clean infrastructure will help to boost growth, create jobs and build energy security and resilience against the ongoing effects of climate change.

Onehunga FM podcast: Candidate for Mayor: Craig Lord wants to get Auckland Council refocused on its core services

In this local body election, what if we could do a little more than a tick and a prayer?

Tim McCready chats with candidates and commentators throughout the local body elections to tease out people’s visions for Onehunga and the surrounding neighbourhoods.

Episode 11:

Craig Lord is standing for Auckland’s Mayor as an independent.

After 16 years in engineering, Craig moved into freelance media. He also works as an MC and Marriage Celebrant.

Craig and his wife have been married for 26 years and have two grown children.

Onehunga FM podcast: Candidate for Mayor: Efeso Collins wants to deliver more than just fares-free public transport

In this local body election, what if we could do a little more than a tick and a prayer?

Tim McCready chats with candidates and commentators throughout the local body elections to tease out people’s visions for Onehunga and the surrounding neighbourhoods.

Episode 10:

Fa’anānā Efeso Collins has been Councillor of the Manukau ward for the last two terms.

Standing for Auckland’s Mayor as an independent, he has the backing of both the Labour Party and the Green Party.

Efeso and his wife Fia have two daughters.

 

Mood of the Boardroom: Business leaders weigh in on Auckland mayoral candidates

Wayne Brown is, by far, the best candidate to become Auckland’s next mayor in the eyes of business.

When asked in the Herald’s Mood of the Boardroom survey which of the top polling candidates of New Zealand’s commercial city has the best attributes to become an effective Mayor of Auckland, 51 per cent plumped for businessman Brown.

“I have been on a board chaired by Wayne Brown,” says one professional director. “He is the kind of no-nonsense person who would cut through many of Auckland’s problems assuming he has at least some support around the council table.”

Brown is regarded as a disruptive player who will get things done.

He is a former mayor of the Far North District Council, serving two terms before being tossed out at the 2013 local elections.

He has chaired Auckland DHB and led a suite of other large organisations with a turnover of more than $1 billion, been a director or chair of various Crown-owned companies and recently led the North Island Supply Chain review for the Labour-NZ First Coalition Government, which recommended shifting Auckland’s port to Northland. A top chairperson suggests he is a “cantankerous man” and will bully his way to ensure things get done — noting that “three years will be enough!”

Mood of the Boardroom: Too many situations vacant

A shortage of workers has become a global phenomenon, with the pandemic severely disrupting the labour market. Employers are finding it increasingly difficult to find staff as employees seek out higher wages, remote and flexible work options, and more satisfying employment opportunities that better align with their values.

Further compounding this has been New Zealand’s border closure, which restricted the flow of migrant workers for the past three years. With the border now reopened, skilled workers and pent-up demand from younger people that delayed their OE are considering a shift overseas.

The labour shortage has become a significant economic issue for New Zealand, and a contributor to the ongoing inflationary environment. Though a rising cost of labour may mean employees receive higher wages as employers attempt to attract and retain staff, the cost tends to be passed on in price increases.

When asked in the Herald’s Mood of the Boardroom survey to what degree employee churn is being experienced in their business, just 3 per cent of business leaders say not at all, and 35 per cent say churn is at a manageable level.

“Less than expected,” says Deloitte chair Thomas Pippos. Adds the CEO of a property management firm: “The rate of churn is probably no higher than it has been in the past.”

But a sizeable 56 per cent say churn is increasing, and 6 per cent consider it to be “off the scale”.

A CEO in the design sector says “the industry simply poaches and incentivises with $40,000 salary increases and we have had to do the same, which is unsustainable.”

A tech company chair says while churn has always been high in the IT industry, it is notably higher now: “And some of the salary packages being offered — like double their current salary — make it almost impossible to avoid.”

Some business leaders experiencing significant staff churn are from the real estate industry. But with house prices falling, sales sluggish and housing stock increasing, one industry leader says: “Staff are leaving because they are simply not making an income from real estate.”

Increased investment in staff development

In an effort to retain staff and make up the shortfall in accessible skilled talent, businesses are placing an increased emphasis on investing in employees.

A massive 73 per cent of respondents say their investment in training and skill development over the past two years has increased.

“Lifelong learning and development is key to a sustainable future,” responds Beca executive chair David Carter. “Our Intermediate Development Academy is our latest initiative to be launched.”

Just 4 per cent say training and skills development has decreased, though the reason for this was mostly put down to financial constraints and “expense management due to the pandemic”, or lockdowns significantly limiting the ability of businesses to run programmes to the same extent.

“Our ability to do this was limited in 2020/21, but has increased in 2022 which has balanced it out,” says the head of a professional organisation.

The remaining 23 per cent say training and skill development levels have remained the same.

Immigration delays causing a major challenge

The current immigration restrictions and its management by Immigration New Zealand is another area seen as prohibitive by CEOs.

When asked how challenging this has been on a scale of 1-5 where 1=very difficult and 5= very easy, they give a combined score of 1.85/5.

This response comes from across the board in terms of sectors. “The agricultural workforce is well under strength in key areas,” writes one CEO. “It took two years to get nurses approved, it is crazy,” says another. From a construction CEO: “Our sector needs skilled workers and ultimately the market needs immigration.”

A university boss writes: “Our chief challenge is around international students — who often become others’ workers. There is a potentially dangerous bottleneck we face.”

The need to address workforce gaps at pace, after such a prolonged period with the border closed, has heaped pressure on to Immigration New Zealand’s visa processing capacity. Last month, Immigration New Zealand stood up a Reconnecting New Zealand Incident Management team, with the authority to make decisions and improve the processing of applications. Business leaders are concerned about these delays impacting their ability to source talent, but also the toll it places on staff who already reside here.

“We have worked through the process with a handful of our team who were here when Covid first hit and have almost made it through the process,” writes a CEO in the property industry.

“It has been laborious more than anything else, but I really feel for our people who are in the middle of it. Until the lengthy process is done, they can’t settle in and make themselves at home — and the mental strain of that is real.”

Boost to working holiday scheme doesn’t go far enough

To address the significant and ongoing labour gap, the Government recently doubled the Working Holiday Scheme cap for 2022/23, which will see a further 12,000 working holidaymakers able to enter New Zealand and is extending visas for holidaymakers.

Immigration Minister Michael Wood said the changes would provide immediate relief to those businesses hardest hit by the global worker shortage.

“We have listened to the concerns of these sectors and worked with them to take practicable steps to unlock additional labour,” he said.

But when business leaders were asked whether the change will help, it was met with a muted response. Of those surveyed, just 27 per cent say it will address labour shortages in their sector.

A substantial 45 per cent say it will not help, and 14 per cent are unsure. The remainder says this question wasn’t applicable to the sector they operate in. Many of those that did respond positively left a caveat — while it may help, it won’t be enough to make up the significant number of works that are required.

“It will help, but not at the previous levels nor at the levels required,” says Accordant Group chairman Simon Bennett.

Deloitte’s Thomas Pippos suggests: “Government needs to better allow the market to operate efficiently and only intervene when there is a (looming) market failure.”

Mood of the Boardroom: View on government moves in banking and supermarkets 

When asked in the Herald’s Mood of the Boardroom survey about the Government buying back Kiwibank to keep it fully locally owned, only 22 per cent of CEOs agree that it was the right thing to do.

“Yes, I support the move,” says the head of a corporate advisory firm. “Although a state-owned enterprise/partial float scenario would have been good for capital markets and improved the bank’s ability to access capital for growth.”

While the head of a professional services firm disagreed with the premise of the question, noting that reporting has been misleading: “They have not bought it back – it was owned by the Crown, and is still owned by the Crown!”

Last month, the Government announced that it would acquire 100 per cent of Kiwibank’s parent company Kiwi Group Holdings (KGH) for $2.1 billion from state-owned shareholders, subject to regulatory approvals from the Reserve Bank.

KGH is 53 per cent owned by New Zealand Post, 25 per cent by the New Zealand Superannuation Fund, and 22 per cent by the Accident Compensation Corporation.

Finance Minister Grant Robertson said that an ongoing shareholding in Kiwibank did not fit NZ Post’s and ACC’s long-term strategic and investment plans.

NZ Super Fund had been interested in purchasing a majority shareholding in KGH, but it withdrew its interest as it did not align with the Government’s commitment to public and New Zealand ownership.

At the time of the announcement, Kiwibank chief executive Steve Jurkovich said the acquisition would enable Kiwibank to continue to deliver on its growth ambitions and have even more impact for its people, customers, and Aotearoa.

“We look forward to working constructively with the Government under our new ownership structure to deliver on our purpose: Kiwi making Kiwi better off,” he said.

When announcing the acquisition, Robertson stressed that the Government is fully committed to supporting the bank to be a genuine competitor in the banking industry, “ensuring the bank has access to capital to continue to grow on a commercially sustainable basis and offer a viable and competitive alternative for New Zealanders”.

But almost two-thirds of survey respondents – some 63 per cent – say they disagree with the move, with the remaining 15 per cent unsure.

Despite Robertson’s reassurance, many are wary that Kiwibank will struggle to get the capital it needs to be successful.

“Look at its cost-to-income ratio, it is a very poor investment that will require much more taxpayer support,” says a banking boss. “The Government won’t have the appetite to invest the capital needed to transform Kiwibank so that it can compete with the Aussie banks.”

From a tech chair: “The mixed ownership model has worked so well. Floating 49 per cent of Kiwibank and applying the discipline of the investment community while giving the bank increased capital would have been awesome.”

“The Government is paranoid about foreign ownership… or thinks that the public is,” says a chair in the banking sector.

Mood of the Boardroom: Christopher Luxon breathes new life into the party

National party leader Christopher Luxon, a former chief executive of Air NZ and of Unilever Canada, brings a business focus to politics. MPs are measured by KPIs and New Zealand business leaders say his focus on discipline is an important skill set for the current environment.

In the 2022 Mood of the Boardroom CEOs survey, respondents were asked to rate Luxon’s performance as Opposition leader, by holding the Government to account on critical national issues, on a scale where 1= not impressive and 5= very impressive.

He received a score of 3.24/5; 6 per cent of respondents gave Luxon a “very impressive” score. The majority (70 per cent) rated him at 3 or 4/5.

Luxon took over as leader of National after just a year in Parliament when Judith Collins was toppled amid poor polling and a chaotic move to demote political rival Simon Bridges. In last year’s survey, her rating was a mere 2.06/5.

Luxon’s rise coincides with a time when the gloss is coming off the Labour Government.

Recent opinion polls show National and Labour neck and neck. The latest Taxpayers’ Union-Curia poll, released last week, had National and Act able to form a government.

National was up 3 points on last month’s poll to 37 per cent and Act up 1 point to 12 per cent.